CC-BY 4.0

Implication of forest zonation on tree species composition, diversity and structure in Mabira Forest, Uganda

Makerere University, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Environmental Management: P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Gondar Agricultural Research Centre, P. O. Box 1337, Gondar, Ethiopia
Environ. Earth Ecol. 2017;1(1):112–122
Supplementary files
The study aimed to investigate effectiveness of forest management zoning in conserving biodiversity of Mabira forest reserve. The study sites buffer, production, and strict nature reserve management zones were purposively selected. This was undertaken through investigating woody species diversity, composition and structure. A total of 60 sampling plots with a size of 20 m x10 m were used to collect vegetation data. Variables such as woody plant species identification and counts as well as diameter at breast height (DBH) of trees were done. The result depicted a total of 65 woody species; 39 in buffer, 19 in productions and 37 in strict nature reserve. Of these, only 9 trees species were found common to all zones and their Sorensen similarity coefficient was 0.2213. The population structure of the buffer and strict nature reserve zones was found to be a J - shape pattern, whereas the production zone shown an inverted J-shape pattern. Higher woody species diversity was depicted in the buffer and strict nature zones with (H’=2. 73512) and (H’=2. 68412) respectively, and lower in a production zone (H’=1. 63628). The evenness index value of a buffer zone was (J =0. 746574), strict nature (J= 0.743335) and production (J=0. 555719). The production zone had shown higher IVI values followed by buffer and strict nature reserve zone. The most important woody species identified based on their IVI value were Broussonetia papyrifera (Production), Acalypha neptunica (Buffer), Funtumia Elastica (strict nature reserve). The existing forest management is effective in conserving the biodiversity of the forest reserve. Nevertheless, the production zone was still suffering from exploitation of the surrounding community, hence serve for protecting the remaining management zones from further human interference. Further investigation is also required on the adjacent community perceptions of the forest management zoning.
Elias Cherenet Weldemariam   
Makerere University, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Environmental Management: P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
1. AES, NP (2001) Description of soils within the region, Appendix B1. Bujagali Project Transmission System, EIS.
2. Alder D and Synnott TJ (1992) Permanent sample plot techniques for mixed tropical forest. London: Oxford University Press,.
3. Bahati J, Banana AY, Gombya-Ssembajjwe W (2008) Assessing the impacts of decentralization on livelihood, biodiversity and ecological sustainability in Uganda: A preliminary analysis of the pilot SANREM/IFRI site.
4. Baranga D (2007) Observations on resource use in Mabira Forest Reserve, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 45(s1), 2–6.
5. Bekele T (1994) Studies on remnant Afromontane forests on the central plateau of Shewa, Ethiopia, Uppsala Univ.
6. Bosu PP, Apetorgbor MM, Nkrumah EE, Bandoh KP (2013) The impact of Broussonetia papyrifera (L.) vent. on community characteristics in the forest and forest-savannah transition ecosystems of Ghana. African Journal of Ecology, 51(4), 528–535.
7. Carreño-Rocabado G, Peña-Claros M, Bongers F, Alarcón A, Licona, J-C, Poorter L (2012) Effects of disturbance intensity on species and functional diversity in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology, 100(6), 1453–1463.
8. Chapman CA., Chapman LJ, Wrangham R, Isabirye-basuta G, Ben-david K (1997) Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of a tropical forest. African Journal of Ecology, 35(4), 287–302.
9. Côté P, Tittler R, Messier C, Kneeshaw DD, Fall A, Fortin M-J (2010) Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of the boreal forest: Possible benefits of the TRIAD. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(3), 418–427.
10. Devine MW (2004) Three Communities, Two Corporations, One Forest: Forest Resource Use and Conflict, Mabira Forest, Uganda.
11. Eilu G and Obua J (2005) Tree condition and natural regeneration in disturbed sites of Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park, southwestern Uganda. Tropical Ecology, 46(1), 99–111.
12. Fungo B, Eilu G, Tweheyo M, Baranga D (2013) Forest disturbance and cropping mixtures influence crop raiding by red-tailed monkey and grey-cheeked mangabey around Mabira Forest Reserve, Uganda. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment, 5(2), 14–23.
13. Giliba RA, Boon EK, Kayombo CJ, Musamba EB, Kashindye AM, Shayo PF (2011) Species Composition, Richness and Diversity in Miombo Woodland of Bereku Forest Reserve, Tanzania, 2(1).
14. Haas GE, Driver BL, Brown PJ, Lucas RG (1987) Wilderness Management Zoning., 85(12), 17–21.
15. Howard PC (1991) Nature Conservation in Uganda’s Tropical Forest Reserves. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge,UK.xvii + 313 pp.
16. Kent M and Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis : a practical approach - Ghent University Library. London: Belhaven press.
17. Lalfakawma, Sahoo UK, Roy S, K Vanlalhriatpuia , Vanalalhluna PC (2009) Community Composition and Tree Population Structure in Undisturbed and Disturbed Tropical Semi Evergreen Forest Stands of North- East India.
18. Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta J A(2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science (New York, N.Y.), 310(5754), 1628–32.
19. Laughlin DC, Bakker JD, Fule PZ (2005) Understorey plant community structure in lower montane and subalpine forests, Grand Canyon National Park, USA. Journal of Biogeography, 32(12), 2083–2102.
20. Lawer EA, Baatuuwie BN, Ochire-Boadu K, Asante WJ, Lawer EA, Baatuuwie BN(2013) Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Vegetation Cover and Natural Regeneration in a Moist Semi-Deciduous Forest of Ghana. International Journal of Ecosystem, 3(5), 148–156.
21. Lung T and Schaab G (2004) Change-detection in Western Kenya: the documentation of fragmentation and disturbance for Kakamega Forest and associated forest areas by means of remotely-sensed imagery.
22. Muthuramkumar S and Parthasarathy N (2000) Alpha diversity of lianas in a tropical evergreen forest in the Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Diversity Distributions, 6(1), 1–14.
23. Nabanoga G, Namaalwa J, Ssenyonjo E (2010) REDD Working Papers: REDD and sustainable development – perspective from Uganda IIED. London.
24. Obua J, Agea JG, Ogwal JJ (2010) Status of forests in Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 48(4), 853–859.
25. Okiror P, ChonoJ, Nyamukuru A, Lwanga JS, Sasira P, Diogo P, Diogo P (2012) Variation in Woody Species Abundance and Distribution in and around Kibale National Park, Uganda. ISRN Forestry, 2012, 1–9.
26. Peters CM (1996) Observations on the sustainable exploitation of non-timber tropical forest products. Current Issues in Nontimber Forest Products Research, 19–39.
27. Pickett ST and White P (1999) The Ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, USA.
28. Putz FE and Redford KH (2010) The Importance of Defining “Forest”: Tropical Forest Degradation, Deforestation, Long-term Phase Shifts, and Further Transitions. Biotropica, 42(1), 10–20.
29. Roberts-Pichette P and Lynn G (1999) Terrestrial vegetation biodiversity monitoring protocols. EMAN Occasional Paper Series, Report No. 9. Ecological Monitoring Coordinating Office. Burlington, Ontario.
30. Silva Pedro M, Rammer W, Seid R (2015) Tree species diversity mitigates disturbance impacts on the forest carbon cycle. Oecologia, 177(3), 619–630.
31. Simon S and Girma B (2004) Composition, structure and regeneration status of woody species in Dindin natural forest, Southeast Ethiopia: an implication for conservation, 3(1), 15–35.
32. Teketay D (1997) Seedling populations and regeneration of woody species in dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management, 98(2), 149–165.
33. Whitmore TC and Sayer J(1992) Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction (xvii +). Chapman & Hall,London.
34. Winterbottom B and Eilu G (2006) UGANDA Biodiversity and Tropical Forest Assessment Report.
35. Worku A (2007) Population Status and Socio-economic Importance of Gum and Resin Bearing Species in Borana Lowlands, southern Ethiopia(Msc. Thesis). Addis ababa, ethiopia: addis ababa university, pp. 30−55.
36. Wright JS (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia, 130(1), 1–14.
37. Zhang Y (2005) Multiple-use forestry vs. forestland-use specialization revisited. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(2), 143–156.